Blog

Donna Brazil’s statement in advance of her book must be a stepping stone for reform. We need to come together and win elections in 2018 but not by business as usual. Dark money has corrupted our political infrastructure and hurts our progress. Although a reformed DNC must follow, let’s focus on our state and county party structure. The following summarizes California Democratic Party Vice Chair Daraka Larimore-Hall and Secretary Jenny Bach statement:

The California Democratic Party is embracing a reform agenda that will enable California Democrats to define the progressive agenda for the 21st century. By announcing a ‘Clean Money Campaign Finance Task Force’ we can win elections, and fund our party, with clean money. The appointed and diverse committee members have embraced a true shared-decision making model as officers, and are working to strengthen the voice of California Progressives in deciding the Democratic nominee for President in 2020. A reform agenda can and will deliver the progressive victories California desevers – getting special interest money out of politics, protecting civil rights for people of color, women, immigrants and the LGBT community, ensuring everyone has access to healthcare, combating climate change, and addressing the cataclysmic income inequality gap between the ultra-wealthy and everyone else.

I am a progressive candidate who wants to see the Democratic Party return to its progressive roots. Help me and other progressive candidates win. By donating directly to progressive candidates, we can rise up and be a better Democratic Party.

https://www.cadem.org/news/press-releases/2017/statement-from-california-democratic-party-vice-chair-secretary-on-donna-brazile-dnc-announcement

My Democratic Party has always had its values and priorities clear. Let’s lead.

According to the City Council of the City of Escondido, our public library is no not ours anymore. By a 4-1 vote, it is now a corporate run concern whose company is answerable to its shareholders not the citizens of Escondido. Council member Olga Diaz was the lone nay vote.

Ultimately, this decision will be challenged, and decided, in court. It will be argued that the City Council’s decision is ultra vires (beyond the scope of their authority) and whose Board of Trustees is correctly entrusted with such decisions. The Board of Trustees did not agree with this privatization of public services.

There are better solutions to these budgetary matters. Falling for the privatization card as the “less expensive” alternative is short sighted. A library is more than a building and some books. It’s a hall of knowledge through which generations pass and add to the collective wisdom of the community. There is no line item for that on the corporate balance sheet.

Our campaign team is phenomenal. In nearly 100 degree heat, this team got the campaign message out in Escondido!

The Escondido Democratic Club met this morning with an aggressive business agenda. Emotions broke loose when the topic of the City’s continued effort to privatize its library came up. A City Council vote is expected this week. I’ll be commenting further on this important community issue.

October 15 is the deadline.

I finished in 56 minutes and won a medal!

Next week, we will focus on educating Californians about Healthy California (SB562) a Medicare for All approach to healthcare in California. The ACA was a good start to get coverage for millions of Californians, but it is not the final answer for 💯% coverage. For those of us who believe access to healthcare is a right and not a privilege, this bill carries us to that goal.

Earlier this year, Speaker Rendon tabled the bill for 2017 making Healthy California a centerpiece campaign issue for 2018. Some were critical of Speaker Rendon for doing this, but the deliberateness of this approach allows for the voters of the state to learn about the bill and vote for candidates, like me, who will support the bill after the 2018 election.

Critics, like my opponent, falsely attack the bill as lacking funding. Here is the correct analysis of appropriations for Healthy California.

1. Total annual costs of about $400 billion per year, including all covered health care services and administrative costs, at full enrollment.

2. Existing federal, state, and local funding (existing funding for Medicare, MediCal, VA, ACA, and CHIP) of about $200 billion could be available to offset a portion of the total program cost.

3. The additional tax revenues can be raised through a combination of an additional payroll tax or tax on cannabis sale and distribution. This is the area of current debate and concern.

4. It is important to note that the overall cost of those new tax revenues would be offset to a large degree by reduced spending on health care coverage by employers and employees. Although precise estimates of total spending for employer sponsored health insurance are not available, the best available information indicates that existing spending is between $100 and $150 billion per year. Therefore, total new spending required under the bill would be between $50 and $100 billion per year and not the $200 billion per year fear mongers like to point out.

5. Thus, employers who provide private insurance to their employees now save tremendously. Others who buy private insurance for themselves or families now save tremendously. Any additional tax pales in comparison to the present cost of private insurance.

The math works. We only need the wherewithal and leadership to get this bill across the finish line. Let’s get out there and help Californians understand this important bill.

Escondido comes alive when we arrive at the Grape 🍇 Day Festival. Come visit me and let’s share some stories!

I hope to see my San Marcos friends at Sunday’s Grand Fall Festival & Street Faire! Come by and visit us!